EPA Brownfields Grants

Just finished four EPA Brownfields grants for some municipalities, counties and coalitions for assessing and/or cleaning up contaminated areas of some pretty noxious stuff. Feels good to do some good.

EPA Brownfields Grants

Working on four EPA Brownfields grant proposals simultaneously. Multi-tasking indeed!

Federal Grants and the State of Florida – A Spending Deficit

The following guest blog article was written by David Lipten, Ph.D., owner/consultant at GrantWorks (www.grantworksonline.com). His article on writing winning federal grant proposals is an encouraging piece for novice grant writers first stepping into the grant writing world.

In 2010, the state of Florida received some of the most generous funding amounts of any state from the federal government in the form of direct expenditures, including grant support, as it has for quite some time. But, it never seems to be enough (in spite of the many calls for cuts to federal spending coming from state politicians, including many of Florida’s). Its citizens are repeatedly told that there isn’t enough money for things like education, infrastructure, housing, etc.

Why should this be the case if, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau, Florida received $187 billion in federal support, the fourth most of any state? In fact, Florida enjoyed the 5^th highest amount of grant support given to any of the fifty states for Health and Human Services, the 4^th most for Education, 5^th most for Transportation, 6^th for Housing and Urban Development, 4^th for Agriculture, and 5^th most for Homeland Security. Per capita, the federal government spent $9,930 on Floridians in 2010, third most in the U.S. But, Florida itself is ranked 48^th in spending on a per capita basis with expenditures of its federal grants proceeds consistently well below the respective national average on a per capita basis. This is true even while such spending increased from $586 in 1996 to $1475 in 2010. These expenditures amounted to $507 less than the national average in 2010 in spite of the fact that Florida was on the receiving end of the 4^th largest amount of all federal grants expended in the country in 2010 (or $27.7 billion).

The preceding begs some important questions, then, namely, why is there such low per capita spending from all of the federal grants received? Why isn’t Florida receiving more grants to support the needs of its population? Also, where is all the money that the state has received going, and where are all the services and benefits that the money is supposed to be providing?

The first question may be somewhat easier to answer. First, funding formulas are often based on outdated population figures that don’t reflect Florida’s growth in recent years.  They are also difficult to revise since smaller states lobby hard to keep them where they are as they stand to lose support if the formulas are, indeed, updated (there are echoes of the reasons cited by the Supreme Court for striking down a provision of the Voting Rights Act here).

As to the second question, again, while Florida has been successful to a point in procuring funding (again $27.7 billion received), the state may not have been as aggressive as it could have in going after all of the federal grant opportunities available to it. In fact, Florida was still $8.1 billion short if one takes into account the state’s population. In other words, Florida should have received something closer to $35.8 billion in grant support.

To be fair, there may also be a dearth of matching funds and there may be onerous federal requirements that limit the receipt of grant funding. But, I’m not sure that these conditions would necessarily account for such a large gap.

I do not have an answer to the third question (i.e., where is all the money going?). I do know, though, that it is a shame and that Florida officials ought to be questioned on this and held accountable (something increasingly difficult to do when there is so much political obfuscation). That said, there are steps to take that might help close the gap. In fact, the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations made a number of recommendations in 2008 that local governments undertake a number of practices to, at least, improve Florida’s grant seeking abilities. Among other things, they called for:

·      Collaboration between local governments and regional entities to explore meeting eligibility requirements for certain grants

·      Determining whether full advantage of grant opportunities is being taken by these entities by comparing their efforts with neighboring or similarly situated local governments

·      Developing direct rapport with personnel from granting agencies once suitable grants have been identified

·      Identifying federal and state policy changes needed to enhance Florida’s access to federal funding streams

·      Supporting state efforts to form coalitions with similarly situated states to pursue changes in outdated or inequitable federal formulas

·      Working to implement changes to federal formulas determined to be outdated or inequitable

·      Pursuing increased availability of state matching funds or other locally available funds

·      Investing in training provided at the state and local levels for accessing federal and state grant funding

·      Increasing communication and coordination on federal funding issues among state agencies, the Governor’s office, the Florida Washington office, the Legislature and the Congressional delegation

·      Enlisting the assistance from Congressional offices to provide letters of support when competing with local governments from other states

And, importantly, from my perspective

·      Conducting cost-benefit analyses to assess the fiscal value of hiring one or more grant writers (something that I discussed in a previous blog entry, “What’s the ROI of a Grant Writer”).

Of course, the preceding recommendations, while seemingly helpful, may or may not help close the gap between funding received and what’s needed. I would like to see the state address these issues. What do you think will help?

David Lipten, Ph.D

Owner/Consultant

GrantWorks

www.grantworksonline.com

granted2u@gmail.com

850 590-8087

New Position!

I have just become an Operating Partner of Stellar Grants (www.stellargrants.com), A PREMIUM SERVICE PROVIDER FOR GRANTS, RFP’S AND BUSINESS SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE DEVLOPMENT OF YOUR BUSINESS.

Building A Pipeline

Well, I'm back after months of extreme grant writing activity. Can you say "stimulus?" I know you can. Just wrote 10 different Federal grants, simultaneously. Phew! Been catching up on my sleep. Now, the question is, where does my next pay check come from? The eternal problem of the freelancer. Could possibly parley the experience into a "regular" job with a firm doing work similar to those I just finished working for, especially since it would seem that there may be quite a bit of work in the energy field (no pun intended) for the foreseeable future. Not willing to relocate, though. Telecommute? Possible. Or, do I have to start where I left off, cultivating local sources, pounding the virtual pavement, so to speak. I'd be interested in anyone who has found themselves in similar circumstances sharing what they've learned about building a pipeline, through which new business flows, so that they do not have to continually re-start their businesses from scratch each time a project is completed.

I will keep you posted as to what I come up with.

Assessing Your Organization's Needs

The first step in getting your organization support is to review your own its program(s) and needs. Your objective is to think of your organization in ways that funders will best connect to. In order to do that, ask yourself the following:
1. Do I have a clear idea of what the program is that I’m trying to get funded? Good idea to have a proposal outline for the specific program in hand before beginning since the terms you use can be used to match those of any funding source
2. Do I know what my organization’s mission is?
For many, if not all, of you, this is an obvious question.
But, being able to translate what you think is self-evident is not always an easy task.
The more you can think of your mission in different, easily explainable terms, the easier it will be to match what you want to accomplish to those of a larger number of funders.
3. Who is being served by your program(s)?
Does your organization serve the general public or does it serve more specialized segments?
Who are they?
What are the racial, ethnic, gender segments of the population you serve?
Do you have demographic figures to support your claims?
4. What geographic area does your organization serve?
Is you’re your program local, regional, national or international?
5. What are the distinctive features of your organization?
Do you generate income?
Are you seeking to create a model program to be replicated elsewhere? Where?
Do you provide direct services or are you an advocacy group?
Other?
6. What is the total dollar amount you are seeking?
Do you know how this amount will be used?
If you can come up with an overall figure and if you can at least sketch out a preliminary budget, it will help you determine how many funders you will need to solicit based on the typical amounts they usually provide and how many different types of funders you can approach based on the categories of needs found in your budget.

What should one do to prepare to create a list of potential funders?

Your non-profit should not only assess things about a potential funder, but should also consider your own organization’s mission, goals, purpose and, especially, needs in order to make a match. You must have a complete understanding of what those needs are and how you can demonstrate that the support you are asking for is both crucial and central to your continued success. And, if you can project what accomplishing your goals will look like in demonstrable terms (i.e., numbers) the more solid your proposal will look like from a funder’s perspective. Successful fundraising depends upon making the right match between your organization and appropriate funders. Determine where your interests converge!